Ok. I haven't written anything in awhile, but after reading Varqas's plea for more output from our little site, I felt obliged to comply. And being the token feminist here at Illmethinks, there was nothing for me to write about but the recent South Dakota abortion ban. I don't want to talk about the boring details, or who is a piece of shit anti-choice governor (Mike Rounds, I'm looking at you...) or how this legislation is going to lead to the Supreme Court abortion cases that the Right-to Lifers are COUNTING ON to overturn Roe v. Wade. I'm going to write about some broader generalities, which is never a good idea... however, I've had a couple of beers, and dammit, I'm going to write about whatever I want.
Louise Frechette, the UN Deputy Secretary-General, had said in many statements that the most specific marker of development in "underdeveloped" countries is the status of women in the society. The more freedom and power the women have, the more advanced and healthy the society is. (P.S. I'm trying to find a link to the speech Frechette made the other day on this very subject, and no matter what search engine I use or which site I come from, the link is dead. Hmmm.) It makes perfect sense. The most basic and powerful right women possess is the right to control their own reproductive systems. Men are notoriously bad at controlling their own sexual impulses; therefore, it falls to women to control population growth. At least, ideally, it should. When we are given the freedom to do just that, population growth is controlled, and society, as a whole, benefits, by not being burdened by unwanted children who drain the "public welfare system", whatever it may be. However, by giving women power over their own bodies, the men feel as though they are losing control over the most systematically oppressed segment of society: the women. When men lose control over one another, over political boundaries and nature, when they have no control over ANYTHING, there is always that one demographic that lies within their control, because of physical dominance: the women. Therein lies the dilemma: the male population of said society, the segment in control, must decide: do we continue the advance towards civilization and solidity, by allowing the women their nature-given role of population control (by letting them regulate their own pregnancies, whether through contraception or abortion), or do we make the conscious decision to REGRESS, removing the reproductive rights of women and absorbing their rights into an increasingly theocratic state? In this way, creating thousands of unwanted children, who will undoubtedly become a burden of the state? The answer, unfortunately, is obvious: given the choice, the demographic in control will ALWAYS seek to continue oppression over another, even though it weakens the societal structure as a whole.
I know it's pessimistic, but give the current political climate, I would have to assume that abortion will be illegal in the majority of states in 20 years. I wish that liberal men would see that this is more than just a "women's rights" issue, because I know that being labeled as such, it holds little weight. It should be seen as a critical issue in relation to our society as a whole. If our system is suddenly saddled with the burden of hundreds of thousands of unwanted children, it will cripple the public welfare system, and become a huge financial problem. I would love to think that men with a social conscience will fight for what is ultimately in the best interest of our society as a whole, but I'm not holding my breath. God, how humiliating for women to have to ask the men to pretty please let us do what we want to our own bodies... Unfortunately, the government seems bound and determined to punish women for having sex, even if it is to the ultimate detriment of the entire population. (A little side note: a male contaceptive pill has been developed and is ready to go, but will never be marketed, because "men won't take it." Would you take the Pill, boys, even if it had a rare risk of making you sterile? Food for thought. More proof that reproductive decisions should be left to women.)
OK, I'm done bitching, guys. I'd love to hear a little feedback.
J.J.